Letter to the Editor

April 2, 2009

Below is a letter I sent to the Birmingham Business Journal to accompany their Annual Commercial Real Estate Deal of the Year Award:

“My nomination for the Commercial Real Estate deal of the year? The one that didn’t happen. This year has reconfirmed that old axiom that occasionally the best deal you did is the one you didn’t do.

I can think of a number of announcements I read nine months ago for new class A office buildings, retail centers, and industrial projects that were to break ground this year, only to be shelved for now. These projects may not have happened due to lackluster lease-up, difficulty in arranging financing, higher than expected construction costs, or just a negative “gut feel” by the developer. How smart do they look now? I can assure you that those developers and their lenders are thanking their lucky stars that they didn’t break ground.

Taking it a step further, the owners of the existing supply of buildings here in Birmingham are also thankful there isn’t more competition coming online. And that’s one of the great things about Birmingham, we’re not a boom/bust town like our larger sister cities. Our developments have been built by mostly home-grown folks who have a good feel for what our market will bear. We don’t seem to attract as many out of town developers and therefore have less volatility.

You’ll read a bunch over the next year about the coming Commercial Real Estate bust that will follow the residential melt down. While I can see how many of the Commercial Mortgage Backed Security Loans were aggressively underwritten over the past few of years, I don’t think we have an excess supply problem. To put it another way, in past CRE downturns, developers sewed the seeds of their own demise by overbuilding. This time is different as supply and demand were in equilibrium for the most part when we entered the recession. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

It is my belief that if you were a smart shopper during the past 5 years, you didn’t overpay based on rosy rental assumptions and you didn’t over-borrow, you should be fine. Conversely, if you bought a deal that only works if rents grow, you are going to feel some pain when your loan renews. It all goes back to being conservative, planning for the worst and hoping for the best.

So congratulations to all the winners listed in this edition and an honorable mention to those of you who had deals that you didn’t do!

Derek Waltchack is a principal at Shannon l Waltchack Investment Real Estate, a local company that aquires, develops and manages commercial real estate. He can be reached at dw@shanwalt.com.”


Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are expected to become one of the most significant investors in the world’s commercial property markets, potentially investing as much as $725 billion during the next seven years, according to a new global report from CB Richard Ellis Group Inc.

Although more than half of the SWFs are believed to already hold direct commercial real estate investments, allocations to the sector are expected to rise substantially. The potential impact on the global real estate market is significant.

“With nearly $4 trillion of total assets currently under SWF control, a 7% allocation would mean worldwide commercial real estate investments totaling $280 billion,” said Ray Torto, chief global economist at CB Richard Ellis. “To put this number in context, the entire U.S. institutional-grade property portfolio owned or managed by investment managers and plan sponsors is valued at approximately $330 billion today.”

“Looking to the longer term, the SWFs’ potential for future property investment is even more significant. It has been estimated that the SWFs could reach total assets of $12 trillion by 2015,” Torto added. “A 7% allocation implies SWFs would make approximately $725 billion of net property investments over the next seven years.”

The influence of SWFs should be felt across the world. In order to achieve target allocations, SWFs will need to diversify future investment widely across geographies, sectors and investment vehicles. Thus far, SWF property investments have been largely concentrated in the U.S. and the Middle East.

“Although SWFs are likely to continue to focus on core real estate product in major markets, they will have to put capital to work in new geographies and emerging sectors. Favored future destinations are expected to include Japan, the U.K. and other countries with currencies that are not held in the SWF’s foreign reserves,” said Michael Haddock, director EMEA research at CB Richard Ellis.

“However, SWFs will have to look to both the indirect investment market and the debt market to fully meet their objectives in the real estate sector,” Haddock added. It is also very possible that we will see outright acquisitions of property companies – listed and unlisted – as a way of assembling a significant direct real estate portfolio rapidly as well as acquiring the property management infrastructure to go with it.”

Based on the SWFs’ existing approach to, and established investment profile in real estate as well as the experience of other major real estate investors, CB Richard Ellis estimates that the SWFs’ projected new investment is likely to be distributed as follows:

“Direct investment is expected to continue to make up the largest portion of the SWFs’ real estate exposure, but as they venture into more locations and more sectors, they will increasingly follow alternate routes into these markets. In particular, unlisted property funds will attract a growing proportion of the SWFs’ real estate allocations,” Haddock said.

….Source Co-Star http://www.costar.com/News/Article.aspx?id=98DBFFA0C1EE3BCC5F0253B04DB438F3#num4

CMBS Issuance Drops to 1996 levels

Issuance of commercial mortgage-backed securities for the first half of 2008 totaled just over $12 billion, a level last seen in the first half of 1996, Moody’s Investors Service reports. The first half issuance is also 91% less than the issuance of about $137 billion for the first half of 2007.

Not only is issuance of the securities down, the pipeline is also dry considering that conduits have to compete with portfolio lenders who are offering borrowers interest rates that are 1.5% below the rate necessary for conduit lenders to break even on deals.

Even then, nobody expects the CMBS vehicle to remain dormant forever. “Most market participants, including Moody’s, believe that the industry will survive, but in a simpler, scaled-down form. It will be a very long time, if ever, before the industry sees issuance volume in excess of $200 billion again,” the credit rating agency says.

So when will the market pick up again? There could be a modest uptick in the second half of 2008 after portfolio lenders use up the money they have allocated to commercial real estate for the year.

For a more sustained revival however, investors will need to feel comfortable with commercial real estate prices and be convinced that the worst is over for the sector.

Until the negative sentiment in the credit markets runs its course and a true bottom is discerned, investors will continue to remain on the sidelines. Considering that commercial real estate reacts to economic conditions and is a lagging indicator, it could take another year or two for investors to jump back into the game.

 

The Wall Street Journal stated, despite declining property prices and the weakening economy, the nation’s commercial real estate sector appears to be holding up. According to Moody’s Investors Service, upgrades of bonds and structured products backed by U.S. commercial property mortgages outnumbered downgrades in the first six months of this year, although the vast majority of ratings actions were affirmations. Moody’s upgraded 234 portions, or tranches, of debt and downgraded 123, while affirming 1,452 tranches of such notes.

a monthly must read….

August 1, 2008

Overtime some advice and commentaries prove to be vastly more accurate and prescient than others.  One guy I follow very closely is Bill Gross, Managing Director of Pimco, a global investment management firm with more than $829.5 billion in assets.  He writes a monthly investment outlook that can be read on their website or can be downloaded on Itunes.   

You’ll find it not to be the easiest read, but well worth your time: http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2008/Investment+Outlook+Bill+Gross+Mooooooo+August+2008.htm

A couple months ago I posed the following question during an office meeting:  “what effects will a higher than normal inflation environment have on Real Estate Investments in general and on our portfolio specifically?”  We came up with a few answers that fell into 2 categories: postive and negative.   On the positive side, by owning existing buildings, you are at an advantage vs. to-be-built buildings as they will cost more to build given the effect of inflation on construction materials.  On the negative side, if you are holding properties with long-term, flat leases, the dollars that you put in your pocket after paying the mortgage will be worth less each year though no less in absolute dollars. 

And as if Mark Heschmeyer was in the room with us that day, he wrote this_article.

DW

The hottest trend this decade in shopping-center development has gone cold.

Known as lifestyle centers, the open-air shopping venues offer small parks, fountains and cafes amid name-brand retailers selling fashion apparel, housewares and other discretionary fare.

Developers raced to add new ones as they became popular with shoppers, especially women between 20 and 50 years old, a coveted category. Meantime, construction of traditional enclosed malls all but stopped.

But now, with the economy slumping and shoppers spending less, retailers that had flocked to the centers — like Chico’s FAS Inc., AnnTaylor Stores Corp. and Talbots Inc. — have begun canceling expansion plans and even shutting stores. Others, such as Linens ’n Things Inc., have sought bankruptcy protection.

This couldn’t happen at a worse time for lifestyle-center developers, which were putting up more of the shopping centers than ever. Last year they built 37 centers totaling some 12 million square feet, or roughly 40 percent of the total lifestyle-center square footage added this decade, according to market-research firm Portfolio & Property Research Inc. Double the 2007 total is now under construction, and three times as much is in the planning stages.

The economic slowdown, of course, means many of the planned projects won’t leave the drawing board. But many centers where constuction has begun will probably have difficulty leasing space when they open. That raises the specter that eventually they may not be able to pay their debt, adding to the strain on the already ravaged finance sector.

Leasing problems have clearly begun. Developer M.G. Herring Group opened its Uptown Village regional lifestyle center in the Dallas suburb of Cedar Hill in March with only half the space occupied and the rest walled off with wood panels bearing the center’s marketing images. President Gar Herring says he has so far signed retailers for 60 percent to 70 percent of the 725,000-square-foot project, though it remains only half occupied five months after its opening.

In Brighton, THF Realty Inc. has filled most of its new Prairie Center retail project with such big-box retailers as Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. and PetSmart Inc. But Prairie Center’s small-shop space — erected in a lifestyle-center format nearby — is mostly empty. Half a dozen tenants, including Heidi’s Deli, Verizon Wireless and Elite Nails, are sprinkled among vacant storefronts sporting “for lease” signs.

Herring and THF executives say they anticipate no difficulties paying their debt service on the projects.

Some believe that the lifestyle-center craze was about to run its course in any case. The metropolitan locations that are best suited to the centers are mostly taken. “There were a number of projects proposed in markets that didn’t really have the (sales) demand to support the projects,” said Stephen Lebovitz, president of mall owner CBL & Associates Properties Inc., which has built two open-air centers.

Certainly the centers being built now show an evolution in the approach to the centers. Recent versions have larger formats and more diverse tenant rosters, including department stores and movie theaters. Few developers now propose the original format, which offers only small shops and spans 200,000 square feet or less.

“Those are dead,” said Maury Levin, a retail-property broker at commercial real estate firm KLNB Inc. in Baltimore.

Construction of other retail-property formats is also slowing as consumer spending wanes. Portfolio & Property Research forecasts that in 2009, retail-space construction in the top 54 U.S. markets will drop 48 percent, to 71 million square feet, from this year.

Existing properties are hurting, too. Vacancy rates at U.S. malls and shopping centers have climbed to 7.4 percent this year, the highest level this decade, according to market-research firm Reis Inc.

Many developers that have the option are canceling or scaling back projects. Citing slow progress in leasing, Opus Corp. opted to proceed in phases at a lifestyle center in the Seattle suburb of Issaquah, Wash., scheduling the opening of 150,000 square feet of shops in 2010. It had planned to open three times as much space in 2009.

In Canonsburg, Pa., developer Cullinan Properties Ltd. has delayed by a year, to 2010, the opening of 200,000 square feet of small shops intended to accompany a 14-screen movie theater as it struggles to lease the space.

What’s tripping up many developers is the tendency of lifestyle-center tenants to travel in packs. The centers often don’t have big anchor stores, so many retailers insist that several complementary stores agree to open in a given center before they will do so. “You may have 10 tenants you want to get, but eight are waiting until the fall to make a decision and the other two are waiting on those eight,” said Frank Natanek, Cullinan’s group president of real estate and marketing.

Poag & McEwen Lifestyle Centers LLC, which has developed 10 lifestyle centers, recently scrapped plans for one in Boise, Idaho, after five retailers reneged on signing leases there and then several more did the same. The Memphis, Tenn.-based developer proceeded with construction of a lifestyle center in Plainfield, Ill., only after tenants there waived the requirement that certain fellow retailers such as Chico’s join the project. Chico’s has pared its expansion markedly to 45 new stores this year from 118 last year.

Despite these stresses, most new lifestyle centers aren’t in danger of immediate foreclosure. Developers and lenders typically structure construction loans to carry fledgling projects through lease-up periods, and they’re hoping that the economy will rebound by the time those reserves are depleted.

“You’re not really going to see these projects get turned over to the lenders until later this year at the earliest,” said Ben Yang, an analyst with Green Street Advisors.

Fortunately, those of us who live in Alabama have been spared the vicious and large declines in home prices. While there is still a ton of inventory and some slippage in values here, it pales in comparison to the mess in California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida. Yet we feel effects through the greater economy and the general mood of consumers.

How much longer do we have until prices nationally hit bottom? One very detailed report prepared by Wachovia Economics Group tries to come up with an answer. The Cliff Note’s answer is they project values will hit bottom toward the end or 2009 or early 2010 and home values will have lost 25% from their peaks in 2006.


We’re pleased to announce our latest acquisition, a 7,200 SF retail strip center at the front door to the Wal-mart Supercenter in Troy, Alabama.

Typically we’ll look at 75-100 deals before we find one that fits our criteria and that we purchase. We thought it might be helpful to explain to brokers (or whoever is reading our blog) what we’re looking for in a deal and how we found that in this property.

The Troy strip has 4 tenants, Rent-A-Center (RAC), Advance America, Alltel and a billboard ground lease (all national or at least regional credit tenants). The center is only 3.5 years old and was built as a build-to-suit for RAC. Four years ago the southern part of Troy was just starting to grow and therefore rents were low. The original lease had RAC at $11.50 PSF and Advance America at $12.00. After the center was built, the developer signed Alltel at around $16.00 PSF.

After undertaking a market survey of existing centers, we found that the market rate in the area is now $16 to $18 PSF and that there were very few vacancies. We were therefore buying a center with below market rents in an excellent location and the price we paid for the building was less than we could build it for today.  Unfortunately we paid a premium for the in-place rents, but don’t mind doing this as our upside occurs at lease expirations. We prefer this scenario over buying a center with above or at market rents where you get to catch a bullet if your tenants blow out. Finally, we’ll only buy in a small town like Troy if there are clear signs that it is growing and is forecasted to continue to do so.

In Summary, we like:
* Below Market Rents
* Excellent Locations
* Below Replacement Costs
* Growing Markets